|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Omara Otawan
   |
Posted - 2011.07.22 21:02:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Wendat Huron
Easy conclusions to be drawn, he's one of the scandinavia for scandinavians people, rightwinger going after the leftist youth as they are easier to shoot than debate with.
Last I read about 30 dead at the island.
Thats my guess too, target selection just does not add up with islamic terrorism.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.22 22:07:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 22/07/2011 22:08:28
Originally by: Jaci Johanna
Quote:
*The sheer volume of their crimes (over 2,000 since 1979);
*The huge economic impact (losses of more than $110 million since 1979);
Wow, a whole $110 million in 30 years?
That surely makes the Oklahoma bombings with 165 killed, over 700 injured and $15 million just in direct bomb damage pale in comparison. 
I'd wager that counting indirect damage that single attack cost way over $110 million.
Why do I get the feeling that these days every hoodrat tagging "**** the system" on a phone booth gets labeled as terrorism?
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.22 22:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Jada Maroo
Obviously radicalized Muslims are a greater threat to your personal safety, but that doesn't mean you ignore the threat posed by the others.
Statistically, being struck by lightning is a far bigger threat to my personal safety than both, and given such an event may set my clothes on fire to my property as well.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.22 22:54:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 22/07/2011 22:55:55
Originally by: Jada Maroo
You know, I thought about qualifying that statement because I knew someone would say exactly that. I'm talking about the realm of terrorist acts, obviously, but yes, both are unlikely to happen to you.
The problem I really have with all that is the fact that real threats to my property and safety, i.e. being mugged/stabbed/shot just two blocks from home, are taking a backseat while terrorism, which does not concern me all that much, is blown way out of proportion.
Especially the so-called eco-terrorism, which if we are honest for a seconds is in the large majority of cases just simple vandalism.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.22 23:58:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Benny Hill
working relationship with Pakistan Bush created
Not sure if you are serious here, but that is pretty much the funniest **** I've read all week.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.23 02:49:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Jada Maroo
Wilkus made the reasonable assumption given the facts available. Car bombing in a major metro setting and a soft target attack with a purposefully high death toll (very Mumbai-like). For events like this, the culprits are almost always Muslim.
If this one isn't, it's noteworthy.
Actually, when government buildings and/or a specific (political or other) group are being targeted, in the western world that is a sure sign of the terrorist being a right/left-wing nutjob.
Since these facts were known with the inital media coverage of the incident, he didnt make a reasonable assumption at all. At least not reasonable for the somewhat educated and non-extremist part of the population.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2011.07.23 07:11:00 -
[7]
Still not done fleecing the dead I see...
|
|
|
| |
|